Monitoring Agent: Elevate Your Observability With Inspector

Valerio Barbera

The last fundamental concept to fully evaluate whether, and how, to invest in a monitoring stack is the type of monitoring agent.

Very briefly, a monitoring system is always composed of two elements.

The agent, which is a software package that you must install in your application or infrastructure.

And the dashboard to view the data.

View the full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3HZDrn1uBs

Monitoring Agent

In principle there are two types of agents.

One that requires to be installed at the infrastructure level, therefore on servers or virtual machines. In this case we can define it as an Infrastructure-Driven tool.

Other tools, however, offer monitoring agents in the form of purely software libraries, which are therefore installed as a library among the application dependencies, and therefore we can define it as a Code-Driven tool.

As you can see in this slide, the infrastructure-driven tools look at your application from the outside of your code. So they couldn’t be able to provide some types of information, but they can grab very deep feedback from the server level.

The Code-Driven tool instead lives inside your application, so they can gather really helpful information about the execution of the application code, but they are less coupled with the server.

It really depends on what you are more interested in.

Software Developers or Operations Hands?

Very often I have noticed that when the platform has a monitoring agent installed on the servers, then the interaction with the monitoring platform is in the first instance in the hands of the operations team, i.e. the team that deals with the management and maintenance of the infrastructure.

Even more so if technologies such as Kubernetes, containers or similar are involved, or Infrastructure as a Service platforms in general.

While if the agent is in the form of a software library, the control of the monitoring system passes into the hands of the software developers.

At first glance it may seem like just a technical feature, which instead has a significant impact on the success of the adoption of a specific monitoring solution.

This is because it drastically impacts the developer experience.

These two teams (Infrastructure Management and Application Development) are often two distinct working groups. Therefore, depending on who is in charge of the interaction with the monitoring system, the other will find himself acting as a passive user and losing interest.

Promote efficiency

The conflict between different teams or members inside a company is one of the most relevant problems that I have noticed, especially as the size of the team grows.

Since today 90% of Observability platforms provide an agent that requires to be installed on infrastructures, and are therefore tools managed by operations teams. As a software developer you risk experiencing monitoring as a bad experience, which does not bring value to your daily work, but rather complicates it.

The direct consequence is that today monitoring is perceived as too complex by software developers, imagining that it is viable only for large companies.

However, it could just be the wrong tool for your team’s needs.

I hope I have given you a useful contribution to free you from these prejudices and help you improve your developer experience.

You now have the right information to better evaluate your real needs and the data you may need to make your software development activity successful.

Don’t be afraid of experimentation, you never know what insights you’re going to uncover inside your application that could end up making all the difference.

Fix Bugs On Autopilot

When an error occurr after a delivery cycle Inspector not only alerts you with a notification, but also creates a pull request on your GitHub repository to automatically fix the error.

Now you are able to release bug fixes after a few minutes the error occurred without human intervention in between. Learn more on the documentation.

Are you responsible for application development in your company? Monitor your software products with Inspector for free. You can fix bugs and bottlenecks in your code automatically, before your customers stumble onto the problem.

Register your account or learn more on the website: https://inspector.dev

Related Posts

Struggling with RAG in PHP? Discover Neuron AI components

Implementing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is often the first “wall” PHP developers hit when moving beyond simple chat scripts. While the concept of “giving an LLM access to your own data” is straightforward, the tasks required to make it work reliably in a PHP environment can be frustrating. You have to manage document parsing, vector embeddings,

Enabling Zero-UI Observability

It is getting harder to filter through the noise in our industry right now. New AI tools drop every day, and navigating the hype cycle can be exhausting. But the reality is that our day-to-day job as developers is changing. Most of us have already integrated AI agents (like Claude, Cursor, or Copilot) into our

Neuron AI Laravel SDK

For a long time, the conversation around “agentic AI” seemed to happen in a language that wasn’t ours. If you wanted to build autonomous agents, the industry nudge was often to step away from the PHP ecosystem and move toward Python. But for those of us who have built our careers, companies, and products on